Thursday, August 3, 2023
HomeEconomyOpinion | Taylor Swift and the Economics of Celebrity Excursions

Opinion | Taylor Swift and the Economics of Celebrity Excursions


Like virtually each different nation, Sweden has been experiencing excessive inflation not too long ago. Client costs have risen 9.7 p.c over the previous yr, reflecting a number of components: massive spending to help households in the course of the pandemic, Covid-related disruptions of provide chains, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and Beyoncé.

Severely. Beyoncé kicked off her newest world tour in Sweden final month, and it has been extensively argued that a large inflow of holiday makers attending her first two live shows precipitated a main, if non permanent, surge in resort and restaurant costs, sufficiently big to have a noticeable impact on Swedish inflation general.

I haven’t seen comparable reviews for the opposite large live performance tour now underway, however I wouldn’t be stunned if Taylor Swift live shows are producing resort and restaurant booms within the cities by which she performs. Stay music is massive enterprise.

However why is it such massive enterprise? And the way has it modified over the long term?

Look, I do know that there are extra necessary points on the market. However let’s take a break right here, principally as a result of I discover desirous about the economics of music enjoyable, but additionally as a result of the live performance enterprise gives some fascinating classes in regards to the generally perverse function know-how can play in figuring out incomes.

Specifically, as I’ll clarify, the actual puzzle right here is why Taylor Swift doesn’t make much more cash.

This isn’t the primary time I’ve written about this topic. Impressed partly by the work of my late former colleague Alan Krueger, I’ve in truth weighed in on Taylor Swift in historic perspective earlier than. However Swift’s newest tour is her greatest but, and I additionally imagine that I’ve some new insights into what could also be happening right here.

So, Taylor Swift makes some huge cash. Being a congenital cynic, I’d prefer to attribute her fame to advertising hype, however the unhappy fact is that she’s a extremely proficient songwriter and musician with exceptional stage presence; have a look at the video under, displaying her solo efficiency at one among NPR’s Tiny Desk live shows. Even should you aren’t a fan, it’s important to admit that she’s the actual deal.

Nonetheless, there are various proficient artists. Why do a couple of earn a lot? There’s a normal financial concept about that, specified by a well-known paper by the economist Sherwin Rosen, “The Economics of Superstars.” Rosen argued that fashionable know-how meant that the potential attain of performers was a lot bigger than it had been when stay efficiency was the one solution to entertain an viewers, so {that a} musician (or, his instance, a comic) who was, or was perceived to be, even a bit higher than his or her rivals may earn massive sums by acting on mass media, promoting data, and so forth.

However on the floor, that’s not what’s occurring with Taylor Swift and Beyoncé. They’re making large sums not primarily from document or streaming royalties however from live shows — which is, by the best way, regular. One of many classes I realized from Alan Krueger is that musicians have at all times made their cash primarily by touring; this was true even in the course of the CD period, when document firms have been earning money hand over fist however passing little or no on to the artists. It’s much more true now, on this age of streaming.

However there are stay performances, after which there are stay performances; ticket gross sales for every of Swift’s live shows are anticipated to be $11 million to $12 million. What know-how explains that?

The reply, if you concentrate on it, is that cutting-edge know-how generally known as the microphone, which makes it potential for an artist to play stay to tens of 1000’s of individuals. To be extra exact, the enabling know-how is microphones plus extra superior up to date sound techniques that make it potential for followers at stadium and enviornment live shows to really hear the musicians (and for the musicians to listen to themselves); these techniques hadn’t but been developed when the Beatles gave their well-known Shea Stadium live performance, which was largely inaudible over the screams.

However right here’s the factor: Vastly profitable excursions by music superstars aren’t a brand new growth. They return no less than to the ’50s — the 1850s, when Jenny Lind, the “Swedish nightingale,” toured America beneath the auspices of none aside from P.T. Barnum. Lind did 95 live shows, with cumulative ticket gross sales of greater than $700,000, or greater than $7,000 per live performance.

That will not sound like a lot, and Lind acquired significantly lower than that — Barnum took a big lower. (Swift — who can also be an excellent businesswoman — is reportedly receiving extra than the income from ticket gross sales, as a result of the promoters anticipate to promote plenty of merchandise too.) However shopper costs within the early 1850s have been about one-fortieth what they’re now, so in actual phrases Lind’s ticket take wasn’t as trivial because it may appear. (Information right here, sadly gated.)

And arguably, even that understates how properly Lind did by fashionable requirements. The quantity individuals are keen to spend to attend a giant cultural occasion presumably depends upon how a lot they’ll afford, and America is, even adjusted for inflation, a vastly richer nation now than it was 170 years in the past. In greenback phrases, per capita G.D.P. is presently about 600 instances as excessive because it was circa 1850. If we alter by per capita earnings, every of Lind’s live shows took within the equal of round $4.5 million immediately.

Swift’s live shows are taking in additional than twice that. However why no more? In any case, Lind carried out in live performance halls that needed to be sufficiently small so that individuals may hear an unamplified (if skilled) human voice; Swift is filling stadiums that maintain 50,000 or extra individuals.

As I mentioned, the actual query, arguably, is why Swift isn’t making much more cash.

One reply is likely to be that the sheer dimension of the venues signifies that Taylor Swift tickets aren’t as scarce as Jenny Lind tickets have been within the day, though offsetting this level is the truth that the U.S. inhabitants immediately is quite a bit larger than it was in 1850.

One other, and I believe higher, reply is that stay live shows play a extra restricted function now than they did 170 years in the past. Again then they have been the one solution to hear music, or no less than professionally carried out music. These days music, together with movies of stay performances, is universally accessible. Stay live shows are nonetheless a particular expertise; as common readers know, they’re one among my chief pleasures in life. However they serve a smaller area of interest of demand than they used to.

In any case, except for her music, Taylor Swift is giving us meals for thought — a reminder each that the consequences of technological progress may be extra advanced than you suppose, and that the applied sciences that matter most may additionally not be those you suppose.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments